There are those vehicles that are truly great. You love to look at them, to drive them (or dream of so doing), to buy them.
Then there are the worst. The stinkers. The overpriced, the ugly, the awful-to-drive, the cars and trucks that just donâ€™t make sense.
We started out by asking you, the reader, to submit up to 10 nominations for best and worst vehicle for 2018. Then we used a scoring system to account for vehicles that were nominated in both categories. The worst 20 vehicles, adjusted for scoring, were then presented for you to choose from. The full list is here.
You had your knives out and sharpened, and you didnâ€™t disappoint. Without further ado, here are the worst vehicles of 2018, as voted by you, the readers, and our staff.
- Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class (tie)
Yâ€™all really arenâ€™t fans of this four-door â€œcoupe.â€� One of you said M-B can do better and any potential buyer should just get a C-Class. Ouch. Apparently an $33K Mercedes with sleek styling is a proposition that sounds great on paper but not so much in terms of execution. One of you called it â€œblasphemy.â€�
- Acura ILX (tie)
This luxury compact doesnâ€™t stir your soul. Acura may be missing an opportunity here â€“ a fun-to-drive sport-luxury compact would likely sell well, and it seems like Acura should be able to build a good one, based on brand history and the history of parent Honda. But the ILX continues to be a miss.
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Bringing back the name of a beloved sports car and slapping it on a crossover is not, repeat NOT, a good idea from a marketing perspective. But Mitsubishi did it anyway, perhaps hoping that the name recognition would overcome the perceived sacrilege. As commenter Ajla said, itâ€™s â€œpoorly poweredâ€� and â€œa mess.â€�
- Chevrolet Trax
Ah, yes. Perhaps the only subcompact crossover that can compete for â€œworstâ€� trophies with Fordâ€™s EcoSport. Chevyâ€™s Trax is slow, a chore to drive, and even the name gives some people the heebie-jeebies. Chevrolet can do better in this class, but it hasnâ€™t as of yet.
- Fiat 500
Fiatâ€™s subcompact city car is on this list because whatever cute factor it may have, thatâ€™s not enough to overcome a subpar interior. Even the existence of the hoonable 500 Abarth isnâ€™t enough. As commenter lprocter82 put it: â€œbecause itâ€™s a Yugo.â€� That hurts.
- Tesla Model X
While other cars in the Tesla stable got good marks, not so with the Model X. Ripped as being poorly designed, Teslaâ€™s SUV doesnâ€™t stack up with the sleek Model S and Model 3 sedans. We eagerly await the Elon tweet.
- Dodge Journey
Old age doomed this venerable people mover more than anything else. While Fiat Chrysler has updated the Chrysler Pacifica and turned it into one of the better minivans in its class, this crossover has been allowed to age quietly, to the point of neglect. Some of you cast judgment on Journey drivers â€“ one of you called it a â€œrolling credit score indicator.â€�
- Ford EcoSport
Ah, the subcompact crossover that’s supposed to hack your life! Instead, it can barely hack it as affordable transportation. Spend any time around the EcoSport or behind its wheel, and youâ€™ll assume it was put together in a slapdash effort for Ford to get a subcompact crossover to market. Instead of Americanizing a vehicle purpose-built for the Indian market, Ford wouldâ€™ve been better served by reading market trends and building something new from the ground up. Alas, that was not the case.
- Fiat 500L
Whatâ€™s worse than a Fiat 500? A Fiat 500L, apparently. One of you called it â€œa strange bubble,â€� though we just refer to it a people mover weâ€™d rather not be seen driving â€“ or riding in. Fiat probably needs a well-designed compact four-door utility vehicle to be competitive (the 500X is nice, but perhaps too small), and this ainâ€™t it.
- Mitsubishi Mirage
Unlike the best car winner, our â€œwinnerâ€� here is no surprise. The Mirage is supposed to be cheap transportation, but while it is possible to do cheap transport well, Mitsubishi seems to have missed that memo. One of you suggests that if your budget is this small, youâ€™re better off with a used Civic. Consider this win a loss for Mitsubishi.
As with our best-vehicle voting, the results change if you sort by average rank as opposed to â€œfirst placeâ€� votes. If weâ€™d done it that way, the Fiat 500L would be the worst car, followed by the Dodge Journey, Chevrolet Trax, Ford EcoSport, and Mitsubishi Mirage.
Itâ€™s possible some voters thought that the worst car should be ranked 20thÂ instead of first. That could explain how the Model X had many 20th-place votes. That, or the typical Tesla polarization. Then again, the Toyota C-HR had plenty of 20th-place votes, but very few first-place votes.
Either way, these 10 vehicles are the worst on the market, according to you in the B and B and those of us on staff. The hate is real.
[Images: FCA, GM, Tesla, Mitsubishi, Ford, Daimler AG, Honda]