If a gearhead is asked for car shopping advice, thereâ€™s a pretty good chance one of their recommendations will be a Mazda. The little Hiroshima Highway Hawks generally land on the sporty side of the segments in which they compete, whether one is talking about compact cars or SUVs.
For ages, the CX-5 has been a stylish entrant in the compact crossover class and is Mazda’s best-selling vehicle in America. It is a car notable for not being imbued with “Handling by Novocain (TM)”Â like so many of its competitors. For 2019, the CX-5 gains an optional 2.5-liter turbocharged inline-four, meaning the CX-5 finally has a mouth to match its trousers.
And, oh yeah, the guy in charge captained one of the most prolific racing teams in the 24 Hours of Lemons.
Dave Coleman is Manager of Vehicle Dynamics Engineering at Mazda. Exacting with his explanations and a font of mechanical knowledge, you get the feeling he was one of the driving forces advocating Mazda to endow an all-wheel drive crossover with truck-sized torque.
Why? For starters, the man was engineering editor at Sport Compact Car magazine for eight years, later seeing fit to help create Eyesore Racing, one of the greatest LeMons racing teams of all time. Their fleet included the â€œHonda CRXdorado Shaftmobile D-Luxeâ€� â€” an early CRX with Continental kit, leopard-skin landau roof, Cadillac grille, custom license plate reading PIMPNâ‰ EZ, and gold wheels. They later upgraded to the Frankenmiata, a car stitched together from the halves of two wrecked Miatas and ghettocharged with a $95.55 turbo from a Mexican-market Dodge minivan.
Daveâ€™s our kind of guy.
The new 2.5L turbo mill is plucked directly from the CX-9 and is available, for now, in only the top two trims of the CX-5. This means shoppers will have to select either the Grand Touring Reserve or Signature trim (in all-wheel drive, natch) if they want to play with 250 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque.
Thatâ€™s right, boys and girls, a compact crossover is now available with tri-century levels of twist, edging up into the territory that was once the domain of pickup trucks.
Note well: owners will make that level of power if â€“ and only if â€“ they feed the thing a steady diet of 93 octane fuel. It is tuned to run on the spicy water known as 87 octane (â€œWe learned our lesson with that one,â€� said Coleman, alluding to occasions when the good stuff was required, much to the chagrin of their customers) but will only make 227 horses. Check out the chart below:
As you can see, the engine loses some of its puff above 4,000 rpm when swilling the bargain juice, with pull taking a hit as well. However, because the engine makes its torque peak way down at 2,000 rpm, that rating remains the same no matter what grade of gasoline is in the tank. When quizzed, the car wranglers on site said theyâ€™d been filling the test cars with premium, which is just 91 octane in that part of Canada.
Mazda has designed and installed what it calls a Flow Control Valve to mitigate turbo lag and improve throttle response at very low rpm. This bit of whiz-bang technology restricts exhaust gases at engine speeds just off idle, not opening fully until about 1,500 rpm. Think of putting your thumb over the end of a garden hose to make the water spray further and youâ€™ve got the general idea.
Itâ€™s a method that works. The vast majority of folks donâ€™t wring their engines to the redline during a daily commute. When driving at 1,500 â€“ 2,000 rpm, your author found it easy to roll onto the throttle and pick up speed without unnecessary downshifts.
This characteristic explains why Mazda is sticking with a six-speed automatic and not entering the Great Cog War of 2018. The spacing of the ratios paired with the availability of torque negates the needs for more gears. Plus, Iâ€™d imagine Mazda doesnâ€™t have enough money to develop a new transmission for this engine. Yet.
Mazdaâ€™s sporty ethos even creeps into the way it programmed the all-wheel drive CX-5â€™s traction control and stability systems. Both the TCS and DSC allowed a bit of slip and spin, respectively, on the snowy British Columbia roads before stepping in with the equivalent of adult supervision. This is great from the perspective of a driver who wants to know whatâ€™s going on at the wheels instead of having power unceremoniously cut with little warning.
Fun fact: Mazda has an “off” button for the stability control on its cars but not the SUVs. Blame a higher center of gravity and the laws of physics for that one.
Outside irresponsible hooning, however, the iActiv AWD system works like an attentive butler â€“ it serves up what you want before youâ€™ve had a chance to ask for it. By taking readings from other systems â€“ outside temperature gauge, wiper speed, angle of the car â€“ the AWD system often delivers power to the rear wheels before the front ones slip at all. For example, if the temperature is below freezing and the wipers are on and the vehicle is pointed up a hill, the thing will figure out that youâ€™ll probably need power to all four wheels and gets on with the job of delivering that before youâ€™ve had a chance to roast the baloneys.
Wheeling our way up the hill to Whistlerâ€™s Olympic Park, a site buried with snow not 12 hours earlier, our tester easily clawed its way through the white stuff with nary a hint of tire slip, unless provoked with unreasonable amounts of right foot. Hoth-like road surfaces blocked the front radar sensors within 10 miles of our departure.
Mazda shod the battleship grey unit shown here with a set of General Altimax Arctic winter tires in factory sizing, great for traction but making it impossible to render accurate judgement on road noise. The carâ€™s trip computer indicated fuel economy hovered around 20mpg during a day of driving in deep snow and copious amounts of idling. Your results will be better. The EPA rates this power team at 22 mpg in the city, 27 on the highway, and 24 combined.
If youâ€™re a fan of current Mazda interior design, youâ€™ll have no complaints with the 2019 CX-5â€™s cabin. The car gains Apple CarPlay and Android Auto this year, worth noting since it seems to have taken a herculean effort to do so.
â€œWeâ€™re the last car on the planet with CarPlay. We know it,â€� said Coleman. This is primarily thanks to Mazdaâ€™s decision to hamper the auto industryâ€™s relentless march towards touchscreens. Remember, Mazdaâ€™s infotainment only responds to finger jabs below 5 mph. â€œIf I had my way, touch wouldnâ€™t even work then,â€� groused Coleman. By forcing drivers to use the tactile-based Commander system on the centre console, thereâ€™s a better chance theyâ€™ll keep their eyes on the road. Such an approach played havoc with Apple and Googleâ€™s touch-based programming.
Buying advice? Well, letâ€™s compare apples to apples in the all-Mazda cart. Base AWD CX-5 trucklets (the only power delivery configuration available with the new 2.5L turbo) start at just $25,750, for which one gets the expected amount of kit with cloth seats and a non-turbocharged engine. In your authorâ€™s opinion, thatâ€™s the pick of the CX-5 litter if one feels they donâ€™t need the turbo.
The turbo is, however, a very tasty proposition. Its 310 lb-ft of torque offers a great amount of shove, pairing very nicely with Mazdaâ€™s sporting pretensions. The initial trim level in which it is available is priced a not-insignificant $3,425 walk northward from the most lavish non-turbo model. Compared to itself, the newly-muscular CX-5 seems expensive.
But one does not shop in a vacuum. Or at least they shouldnâ€™t. A glance at the top-tier models in the CX-5â€™s competitive class reveal machines that are significantly less powerful but similarly priced. The turbo 2019 CR-V produces 190 lb-ft of torque out of its 1.5L mill, while the new RAV4 makes do with even less. The popular CR-V is $34k and change at its upper-rung level, while Toyotaâ€™s snazzy new RAV is about five hundred simoleons less than the Honda in comparable spec.
With these looks and this amount of power, the 2019 CX-5 Turbo is a poor manâ€™s Alfa Romeo Stelvio. Theyâ€™ve similar thrust and bold looks, but the Mazda is at least ten grand cheaper. Plus, thereâ€™s a ninety-nine and a bunch more nines percent chance the Mazda will still work in ten years, a forecast no one in their right mind is willing to make for the Alfa.
Well done, Dave. Youâ€™ve earned a break. Youâ€™re free to go and build some more Miatas shaped like the Starship Enterprise to race in the 24 Hours of Lemons.
[Images: Matthew Guy/TTAC]